Claim

结论

A system is good when it helps you locate why you were wrong. A system is fragile when it only helps you justify yourself.

一个系统的价值在于：当你错了，它能帮你定位“错在哪里”。如果它只能帮你自圆其说，那它很脆弱。

Why this matters

为什么重要

• Life rewards correct updates, not strong opinions.
• Memory is a storyteller. Notes should be a witness.
• Many failures are not execution failures—they are assumption failures.

• 现实奖励的是“正确更新”，而不是“强烈立场”。
• 记忆擅长讲故事；笔记应该更像证人。
• 很多失败不是执行问题，而是假设崩了。

A minimal template

一个最小模板

When you make a decision, write it like you expect a smart critic to read it later:

当你做决策时，把它写成“未来会被聪明的批评者审阅”的样子：

Counterexamples

反例

There are cases where “polite disagreement” is the wrong goal:

也有一些场景，“礼貌地反对”不是目标：

• Creative work: you sometimes need protective delusion to finish a draft.
• Emergency response: you need fast action, not perfect epistemology.
• High-trust teams: some decisions live in shared context and don’t need full documentation every time.

• 创作：你有时需要一点“自我保护式幻觉”来把初稿写完。
• 应急：需要先行动，而不是先把认识论写完。
• 高信任团队：有些决策依赖共同上下文，不需要每次都写到完美。

What would change my mind

什么会让我改变观点

• Evidence that detailed decision notes systematically reduce speed without improving accuracy.
• Evidence that the discipline increases anxiety without improving outcomes.
• A better template that yields more learning per minute.

• 证据表明：更详细的决策记录系统性拖慢速度，却没有提高正确率。
• 证据表明：这种纪律主要提升焦虑，却没有改善结果。
• 出现更好的模板：单位时间带来更多学习与校准。